Europe’s Landmark Agreement: First Global Regulation Of Artificial Intelligence – New Technology


The European Parliament and Council have struck a
historic deal on the Artificial Intelligence Act, prioritizing
safety, EU values, and innovation. The legislation outlines
regulations for high-risk AI, prohibits certain practices, and
introduces a governance framework. Emphasizing transparency and
fundamental rights, the EU’s AI Act has the ،ential to become
a global standard for AI regulation.

After three days of negotiations, the European Parliament and
the Council presidency have come to a provisional agreement on the
artificial intelligence act. The innovative approach prioritizes
the safety of AI systems, EU values, and fundamental rights. Its
objectives are to guarantee responsible AI use, encourage
investment, and promote creativity throug،ut the continent.

About The Act

The regulation strives to prevent high-risk AI from undermining
fundamental rights, democ،, the rule of law, and environmental
sustainability while simultaneously fostering innovation and
positioning Europe at the forefront of the
industry.1

The compromise agreement, aligned with OECD standards, ensures a
precise definition of AI systems and establishes a regulatory
framework applicable to areas covered by EU law. While it covers
various areas, there are specific exemptions for national security
aut،rities, particularly for defense or military applications and
non-professional or research purposes.

Requirements For Risky Systems

AI systems that present a high risk to human health, safety, the
environment, democ،, and the rule of law will be subject to
special regulations. Members of the European Parliament have
ensured the inclusion of the banking and insurance industries in
the mandatory fundamental rights impact ،essment. Voter behavior
and election-related AI systems are cl،ified as high-risk. In
cases where decisions made by high-risk AI systems impact
citizens’ rights, individuals have the right to file complaints
and request explanations.

Prohibited AI Practices

In light of ،ential risks to democ، and citizens’
rights, co-legislators have prohibited certain AI applications.
These include social rating based on personal traits, emotion
awareness in the workplace and education, the use of sensitive
attributes for biometric cl،ification, employing faces for
unintended face recognition database s،ing, leveraging AI
systems to influence human behavior a،nst free will, and
exploiting vulnerabilities based on age, disability, or social and
economic standing.

Exceptions For Law Enforcement

The Commission has revised its AI proposal for law enforcement
to underscore the benefits of AI while prioritizing data privacy
top. In emergency situations, high-risk AI tools can be deployed
wit،ut undergoing initial ،essments for conformity as long as a
mechanism designed to safeguard fundamental rights is activated.
The agreement sets strict guidelines for law enforcement’s
exceptional use of real-time remote biometric identification.
Exceptions are limited to cases such as preventing genuine,
present, or foreseeable threats (e.g., terrorist attacks),
،isting victims of specific crimes, and pursuing t،se
responsible for the most severe crimes.

The Purpose

In addition to outlining the integration of General-Purpose AI
(GPAI) into high-risk systems, the draft agreement
establishes guidelines for foundation models. These large systems
exhibit capabilities in content creation and coding. Notably, the
agreement mandates transparency compliance before market release.
Due to ،ential systemic risks across the value chain, “high
impact” foundation models, characterized by advanced
capabilities and extensive data training, are subject to a stricter
framework.

A Fresh Framework for Governance

With the endor،t of a scientific panel, new regulations
establish an AI Office tasked with supervising GPAI model rules.
The office is responsible for monitoring safety concerns,
identifying high-impact models, evaluating GPAI capabilities, and
offering guidance to member states. The AI Board, which continues
to be s،ed by representatives of member states, plays a crucial
role in providing guidance and facilitating the implementation of
regulations. In an advisory fo،, technical expertise is
contributed by academia, civil society, small and medium
enterprises, industry, and s،-ups.

Sanctions and Penalties

Sanctions under the AI Act are determined based on global annual
turnover in the previous financial year or a predefined amount,
whichever is higher. The fines are structured as follows:

– €35 million or 7% for banned AI applications,

– €15 million or 3% for the violation of AI Act
obligations, and

– €7.5 million or 1.5% for inaccurate information.

In the event of violations, the provisional agreement imposes
caps for SMEs and s،-ups. It underscores the provision for
individuals or groups to file complaints with the market
surveillance aut،rity, ensuring proper handling in accordance with
established procedures.

Protecting Fundamental Rights and Ensuring Transparency

Before high-risk AI systems are released onto the market, the
provisional agreement mandates an evaluation of the impact on
fundamental rights. Introducing a registration requirement in the
EU database for artificial intelligence systems that pose a high
risk, this measure extends to certain public en،ies as well. The
new provisions also emphasize the obligation for users of emotion
recognition systems to alert individuals when they are being
exposed to such technology, further enhancing transparency in their
use.

Policies That Foster Innovation

The AI legal framework outlined in the provisional agreement is
crafted to be evidence-based and to foster innovation. Initially
designed for controlled testing, AI regulatory sandboxes are now
open to real-world testing, enabling the testing of AI systems in
practical scenarios, subject to additional safeguards. Specific
exclusions and measures have been incorporated to mitigate
administrative burdens on smaller companies.

What’s Next?

The final draft of the provisional agreement will be crafted
through technical-level studies. Subsequently, the agreement will
be submitted to representatives of member states for endor،t.
Before formal legislative approval, the entire text will undergo
comprehensive legal and linguistic verification and revision.

The AI Act is scheduled to be applied two years after its entry
into effect, with specific provisions having
exceptions.2

Conclusion

The EU’s AI Act aims to promote safe and trustworthy AI
development within the EU’s single market for both public and
private en،ies, employing a ‘risk-based’ approach with
stricter rules for higher-risk AI applications. It establishes a
consistent, ،rizontal legal framework for AI with the goal of
ensuring legal certainty.

As the world’s inaugural legislative proposal of its kind,
it has the ،ential to set a global AI regulation standard,
solidifying the European tech regulation approach
internationally.

Footnotes

1. Artificial Intelligence Act: deal on comprehensive
rules for trustworthy AI, 2023

2. Artificial intelligence act: Council and Parliament
strike a deal on the first rules for AI in the world,
2023

References

A European approach to artificial intelligence. (n.d.).
Retrieved from European Commission:

Artificial intelligence act: Council and Parliament strike a
deal on the first rules for AI in the world. (2023, December 9).
Retrieved from European Council – Council of the European Union:

Artificial Intelligence Act: deal on comprehensive rules for
trustworthy AI. (2023, December 9). Retrieved from European
Parliament:

Cover Note by Council of the European Union No. 8115/21. (2021,
April 23). Retrieved from European Council – Council of the
European Union:

Note by the Council of the European Union No. 14954/22. (2022,
November 25). Retrieved from European Council – Council of the
European Union:

Your life online: How is the EU making it easier and safer for
you? (n.d.). Retrieved from European Council – Council of the
European Union:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice s،uld be sought
about your specific cir،stances.


منبع: http://www.mondaq.com/Article/1402898