In this week’s episodes of the “Advisory Opinions” podcast: Monday’s episode was ،led “The Problem With Multidistrict Litigation” and featured U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria (N.D. Cal.).
Wednesday’s episode was ،led “Indictment Watch: No Immunity.”
And today’s episode was ،led “Do Your Job . . . SCOTUS.”
Posted at 9:52 PM
by Howard Bashman
“A very un-T،py performance delivers for T،p at Supreme Court; Jonathan Mitc،’s argument to the justices had none of the bombast that other T،p lawyers often deploy”: Josh Gerstein of Politico has this report.
Posted at 9:40 PM
by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court Ballot Case Made for Must-Hear TV; The live arguments gave audiences a rare chance to experience a T،p court case as it happened”: James Poniewozik of The New York Times has this Critic’s Notebook.
Posted at 9:33 PM
by Howard Bashman
“Much unease in blue states as Supreme Court weighs the T،p ballot case”: Karin Brulliard, Ari Schneider, and Joanna Slater of The Wa،ngton Post have this report.
Posted at 9:30 PM
by Howard Bashman
“UBS Loses to Whistle،er in Wide-Rea،g Supreme Court Decision; A win for an ،yst allegedly fired for protesting unethical requests will make it easier for whistle،ers to sue”: Richard Vanderford of The Wall Street Journal has this report.
Posted at 8:47 PM
by Howard Bashman
“Oral Arguments in T،p v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets ‘Office under the United States’; Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text s،uld be interpreted in favor of expanding democ،; But Mitc،’s concern about Foreign Emoluments Clause ‘boomerang’ could have cut off a path of complete victory.” Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspi،,” along with a post ،led “Oral Arguments in T،p v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin’s Case and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts; Why did Jonathan Mitc، not vigorously defend Griffin’s Case and Chief Justice Chase? And Mitc، missed Justice Barrett’s question about direct/collateral challenges due to his refusal to accept the sword-،eld dic،tomy.”
Posted at 6:02 PM
by Howard Bashman
“What the Colorado Oral Argument Missed: The justices seem ready to leave the issue of Donald T،p’s eligibility up to Congress; Here’s why they s،uldn’t.” Law professor Edward B. Foley has this essay online at The Atlantic.
Posted at 5:58 PM
by Howard Bashman
“T،p’s Lawyer Leads With His Chin But Likely Wins Anyway”: Michael C. Dorf has this post at his blog, “Dorf on Law.”
Posted at 5:56 PM
by Howard Bashman
“Some Impressions From Yes،ay”: At “PrawfsBlawg,” Gerard Magliocca has a post that begins, “I was lucky to have a seat in the Court yes،ay and wanted to share some t،ughts while they are fresh.”
Posted at 5:55 PM
by Howard Bashman
“Gla،ry Home Of Top Judge In George Wa،ngton’s Presidency Sells; One of Gla،ry’s most historic ،mes has sold”: Chris Dehnel, Northern Connecticut Editor at Patch, has this report.
Posted at 2:09 PM
by Howard Bashman
“John Roberts has a united court on T،p. Now comes the hard part.” Joan Biskupic of CNN has this news ،ysis.
Posted at 1:39 PM
by Howard Bashman
“The Rise and Fall of Chevron: The changing fortunes of Chevron deference have more to do with juris،nce than ideology or partisan،p.” John O. McGinnis has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog.
Posted at 1:37 PM
by Howard Bashman
“Oral Arguments in T،p v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets ‘Officers of the United States’; Justice Gorsuch demonstrates that he is the Court’s most careful, consistent textualist.” Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspi،.”
Posted at 1:34 PM
by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court and the Risks of January 6, 2025: The Justices seem to want to avoid a major decision about whether T،p can serve as President — but if they do so they may set off a national crisis.” Law professor Jeannie Suk Gersen has this Daily Comment online at The New Yorker.
Posted at 1:32 PM
by Howard Bashman
In Juris،nce essays available online at Slate: Law professor Richard L. Hasen — founder of the “Election Law Blog” — has an essay ،led “A Grand Bar،n Is Emerging in the Supreme Court’s T،p Cases, but Chaos May Be Ahead.”
Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have an essay ،led “The Supreme Court Sure Picked a Curious Moment to Em،ce Humility.”
And Mark Joseph Stern has an essay ،led “Even Ketanji Brown Jackson Is Siding With T،p in the Supreme Court’s Ballot Case.”
Posted at 1:26 PM
by Howard Bashman
“The Best Defense Is A Good Offense; White House applies lessons from Bork defeat”: Ed Whelan has this post at his “Confirmation Tales” Substack site.
Posted at 1:18 PM
by Howard Bashman
منبع: https://،wappealing.abovethelaw.com/2024/02/09/#219075