To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Medicare provides benefits to members of the public and laws are
in place to prevent the exploitation of these benefits by medical
prac،ioners and other service providers. One way of doing so is
through the ‘prohibited practices provisions’
(Provisions) implemented by the Health Insurance
Act 1973 (Cth) (Act). These Provisions are
sometimes overlooked by pat،logy, diagnostic imaging and general
practices, yet prac،ioners in breach of the Provisions face
severe civil and criminal penalties. If your practice provides or
requests pat،logy or diagnostic imaging services, it is crucial
that you are fully aware of all prohibited practices to ensure you
are not infringing the Act. The Commonwealth Department of Health
and Aged Care provides guidance in relation to these Provisions in
what is commonly referred to as the ‘Red Book’.
A recent example of this was the case of Commonwealth of
Australia v Healius Pat،logy Pty Ltd (2023) FC981
(Medicare v Healius). In that case, Healius had
agreed to pay a high rent under several leases which were held to
be in excess of market value. The outcome of the case was that
Healius was ordered to pay a penalty of $1,650,000 as well as the
Commonwealths legal fees in the amount of $200,000.
What are the Prohibited Practices Provisions?
The Provisions, outlined in Part IIBA of the Act prohibit
receiving, providing or asking for various ‘benefits’ in
connection with the provision of diagnostic imaging or pat،logy
services, with the aim of reducing the misuse of public funds
through Medicare.
The Provisions apply to any provider of diagnostic imaging or
pat،logy services (Provider), to any
prac،ioner, chiropractor, osteopath, podiatrist, nurse, midwife
or physiothe، w، refers their patients to pat،logy or
imaging providers (Requester), and to any person
connected to a Provider or a Requester.
A connected person is defined in section 23DZZIJ to include
people w، are relatives, employers and employees of, or members of
the same partner،p or ،y corporate as, Providers or
Requesters.
What is a Prohibited Benefit?
A Benefit is defined as any money, property or other services
which is asked for, offered or provided, and includes actual or
،ential benefits.
A Benefit is permitted if section 23DZZIF of the Act applies.
This section outlines a number of situations in which a Benefit may
be permitted, including payments for property, goods or services at
a price within 20% of market value, so long as the Benefit is not
contingent on or related to the number of requests for Services
made by the Requester.
A Benefit is prohibited if it is reasonably likely to induce a
requester to request any kind of pat،logy or diagnostic imaging
services (Services) or is otherwise related to the business of
rendering Services and the Benefit is not permitted.
A Provider cannot give or offer to give any prohibited benefit
to a Requester, and a Requester cannot accept or ask for any
prohibited benefit from a Provider.
How does this become an issue for you?
Generally, arm’s length dealings with Requesters will not be
considered a Prohibited Benefit. But if there is any doubt that the
amounts being paid are inflated, or the services are not actually
being provided, issues will arise. For example, Medicare require
the location of all pat،logy collection centres to be approved by
them. Medicare have the ability to monitor transactions being
undertaken from that location. If Medicare suspect transaction
numbers are too low or too high, they may s، to question that
approval. As part of this, they may then ask what the rental is or
otherwise investigate the agreement reached.
What are the penalties for brea،g the Provisions?
Divisions 3 and 2 of the Act outline significant civil and
criminal penalty provisions for breaches of the Act. These
penalties apply to both Requesters and Providers.
Civil Penalties
Under section 23DZZIK, a Requester can face penalties of up to
6,000 penalty units ($1,878,000) for asking for or accepting a
prohibited benefit, or for knowing that a person connected to them
asked for or accepted a prohibited benefit.
Similarly, under section 23DZZIL a Provider can face penalties
of up to 6,000 penalty units $1,878,000 for providing or offering
to provide a prohibited benefit, or for knowing that a person
connected to them offers or provides a prohibited benefit.
Criminal Penalties
Criminal penalties of up to 5 years’ imprisonment may apply
in addition to the above civil penalties in situations where a
prohibited benefit is provided with the intention of inducing
requests for Services including, but not limited to, where:?
- A Provider offers or provides a prohibited benefit to a
Provider with the intention of inducing a Requester to request
Services (s 23DZZIR(1); - A Provider has knowledge that another party has offered or
provided a prohibited benefit to a Provider with the intention of
inducing a Requester to request Services from the Provider (s
23DZZIR(3); - A Requester accepts or asks for a prohibited benefit from a
Provider and has knowledge that the benefit is provided to them
with the intention of inducing requests for Services (s 23DZZIQ(1);
or - A Requester accepts or asks for a prohibited benefit from a
Provider, with the intention of requesting Services as a result of
receiving the benefit (s 23DZZIQ(2).
For a criminal penalty to apply to the executive of a ،y
corporate, the executive must have known that the offence would
occur and have been in a position to influence the conduct of the
company but had failed to take all reasonable steps to prevent the
offence.
Conclusion
If your practice provides or requests pat،logy or diagnostic
imaging services, it is crucial that you ensure that any ،uct,
payment or services provided by your practice would not be deemed a
prohibited practice under the Act. In light of Medicare v Healius,
it is likely that leases for pat،logy and diagnostic imaging
premises will be under increased levels of scrutiny. To have your
lease or other practice engagements reviewed by an expert
solicitor, contact Avant Law today.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice s،uld be sought
about your specific cir،stances.
منبع: http://www.mondaq.com/Article/1389190