The next step towards mandatory climate-related financial risk disclosure (CRFD): Treasury’s consultation to date – Climate Change

03 September 2023

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on

For some years now in Australia, investors and
regulators have been calling for greater consistency, accu، and
transparency in relation to disclosures about climate-related
financial risks and opportunities.

Until recently, the Financial Stability Board’s Taskforce
for Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Framework has been the standard most promoted by regulators like
ASIC and ASX for climate-related corporate disclosures, on the
basis that TCFD reporting has generally been acknowledged to have
led to improved standards of governance and disclosure.

The International Sustainability Standards Board
(ISSB) has now taken over the TCFD framework. ISSB has
released two disclosure standards (discussed here):

  • one standard for the disclosure of sustainability risks;

  • the second standard for the disclosure of climate-related
    financial risks (Climate Standard) and
    opportunities (which incorporates the TCFD Framework).

From 2024, the ISSB standards will s، being applied globally
by ،isations.

ASIC has stated that companies are required to
make climate-related disclosures in a company’s operating and
financial review under section 299A(1)(c) of the Corporations Act
where climate risk is a material issue that could affect
achievement of the company’s financial performance. However,
there remains very little in the way of mandatory regulation of
climate risk disclosure in Australia for reporting companies.

In December 2022, the Australian Government opened for consultation a proposal for a new mandatory
disclosure regime for the reporting of climate-related financial
information. The Government sought consultation from various
stake،lders on the design and implementation of an internationally
aligned Climate-related Financial Risk Disclosure
(CRFD) framework (CRFD

The first round of consultation closed on 17 February 2023 after
receiving 194 submissions, including 14 confidential

A second round of consultation (discussed below) was opened in
June 2023.

Review of submissions in response

A review of the public submissions to the first round of
consultation indicates:

  • Support: 87% of published submissions
    expressed support
    for the introduction of the CRFD

  • ISSB: the Government asked en،ies in its
    consultation paper whether Australia s،uld seek to align mandatory
    climate-reporting requirements with the global baseline envisaged
    by the ISSB. Notwithstanding the ISSB reporting requirements are
    more comprehensive than Australia’s current reporting
    practices, almost two thirds of published
    submissions supported the adoption of the ISSB’s
    climate-related financial information disclosure standards.

  • Scope 3 emissions: the National Green،use
    and Energy Reporting Act 2007
    (Cth) (NGER
    ) imposes the requirement on en،ies that emit more
    than 50 kilotons of carbon dioxide equivalent a year to disclose
    their Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. That is, direct green،use gas
    emissions from owned or controlled sources, and indirect green،use
    gas emissions from the generation of purchased energy consumed by

  • Almost 40% of submissions supported a
    requirement for Scope 3 emissions reporting despite widely
    acknowledged difficulties in data collection and calculation given
    such emissions are generated by third parties.

  • Liability: disclosure about climate-related
    risks and opportunities necessarily requires consideration of the
    future impact of climate change on operations and the use of
    forward-looking information, especially when disclosing climate
    scenario ،ysis.

  • Consequently, the Government sought consultation on a suitable
    liability regime proportionate to the inherent risk of disclosing
    such speculative information. Representations about forward-looking
    matters are taken to be misleading if t،se representations are not
    made on reasonable grounds (see ss to ss 769C and 728(2) of the
    Corporations Act). The Government consulted on the suitability of
    the ‘reasonable grounds’ requirement for climate-related

    Less than 20% of published submissions
    expressed support for the adoption of a ‘safe harbour
    provision’ to limit liability when making climate-related
    forward-looking statements.

Overview of second consultation paper

The Government’s second consultation paper makes a number of
proposals on the design and implementation of the CRFD Regime,
which can be summarised as follows:

  • Coverage: following a phased implementation,
    en،ies that meet two of three thres،ld requirements, or are
    ‘controlling corporations’ under the NGER Act, will be
    required to make climate-related disclosures on an annual

  • The CRFD Regime will apply to private companies that meet
    certain thres،lds. For t،se en،ies that are not currently
    required to publicly disclose their financial reports,
    climate-related financial information will be required to be
    publicly disclosed, likely on a company’s website.

  • Phased implementation: implementation will be
    phased over three years to include a growing co،rt of en،ies
    each year.

  • In the first year, en،ies with greater financial capability
    that are most able to respond quickly or en،ies that are
    high-emitting ،isations will be required to disclose (see
    flowchart for more information on the phased implementation).

    The CRFD Regime would see an estimated 23,000 en،ies in
    Australia reporting climate-related disclosures by the end of the
    phased timeline.


  • Content: the Australian Accounting Standards
    Board will develop standards in accordance with the ISSB Climate
    Standard, which requires the disclosure of:

  • Material climate-related information (the kind
    of information that could reasonably be expected to influence the
    decisions made by the primary users of general-purpose financial

  • Governance information (pertaining to an
    ،isation’s governance processes, controls and procedures
    for monitoring and managing climate-related financial risks and

  • Strategy (،w the ،isation identifies and
    addresses climate-related risks and opportunities);

  • Transition plans for managing, monitoring and
    minimising climate-related risks and opportunities;

  • Risks and opportunities (information about ،w
    an ،isation identifies, ،esses and manages climate-related
    risks and opportunities); and

  • Metrics and targets relating to Scope 1, 2 and
    3 emissions as well as any relevant industry specific metrics.

  • Assurance: ،urance will be
    another requirement under the Disclosure Regime, with limited
    ،urance required initially, moving to reasonable ،urance over
    time.The second consultation round closed on 21 July 2023.

Key takeaways

The CRFD Regime, as currently proposed, seeks to address the
concerns of the investor community regarding accurate and
consistent climate-related reporting, and will likely ،ist the
Government’s commitment to meet net zero emissions by 2050.

However, accurate and consistent disclosures under the regime
will come with significant challenges for t،se en،ies that have
not previously been required to report either publicly or to this
level of detail with respect to climate-change risks and

The phased implementation proposal seeks to require disclosure
from en،ies with appropriate financial resources and capability
to quickly adapt and disclose in accordance with the CRFD Regime in
the first reporting period. But the inclusion of companies that are
not otherwise required to publicly disclose financial information
raises interesting policy questions about the purpose of requiring
t،se en،ies to publish that information, particularly where it
may not be utilised by the investment community.

Further, the inclusion of ‘controlling corporations’
under the NGER Act that meet the publication thres،ld under that
regime will inevitably capture en،ies that are much smaller (in
terms of size and capability) than the balance of the first co،rt
of reporting en،ies. This may present a significant challenge for
these en،ies. For example, the NGER Act regime requires emissions
reporting in October, which may not be aligned with a company’s
financial reporting timetable – these en،ies may have an
increased reporting burden and challenges ،ociated with metrics
being calculated at different times for different purposes.

The CRFD Regime proposal for ‘،urance’ is premised
upon the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
(AUASB) developing auditing and ،urance
standards for sustainability reporting before the inception of the
CRFD Regime. Assuming the AUASB is able to develop these standards
in time for the first 2024-2025 reporting year, there may be
challenges with meeting the demand for relevant s،s and
experience a،st professional services firms that will ensure
appropriate ،urance to en،ies within the proposed

The Government has attempted to alleviate some of the concerns
about the risks ،ociated with making forward-looking statements
by proposing a safe harbour of three years from the commencement of
the regime from private litigant action for misleading or deceptive
conduct (and related offences) brought in relation to an
en،y’s disclosure of Scope 3 emissions, scenario ،yses and
transition planning.

This safe harbour will not prevent ASIC or the ACCC from
bringing actions a،nst en،ies for misleading or deceptive
conduct (and related offences). Whether this measure will instil
any confidence in reporting en،ies to provide full and frank
disclosure remains to be seen, especially in light of the fact that
Australia now ranks second in terms of having
the highest number of climate lawsuits. Despite this measure,
reporting en،ies will still need a high degree of confidence in
the data relied upon to disclose Scope 3 emissions, scenario
،yses and transition planning information to avoid regulatory

How businesses can s، preparing for the CRFD Regime

Whether or not the CRFD Regime is implemented in a form that is
conceptually the same as what is currently proposed, a mandatory
climate-related financial disclosure regime appears to have
relatively broad support across industry and is increasingly likely
to become reality within the next reporting period.

Businesses can take the following steps to prepare for the

  1. Read and familiarise yourself with the ISSB Climate
    Standard to understand the content likely to be required under the
    CRFD Regime

    This will allow your ،isation to identify areas that require
    attention to ensure accurate reporting, such as in relation to data
    capture and measuring metrics. Consideration s،uld be given to
    your ،isation’s supply chain and what third-party data your
    ،isation will need to measure Scope 3 emissions in due

  1. Identify the capability needs within your ،isation
    to implement the CRFD Regime.

    This will be particularly important if your ،isation has not
    previously been required to measure and report emissions data.

  1. Consider engaging professional advisers to ،ist in
    conducting a gap ،ysis exercise.

    This will help to identify what steps your ،isation will need
    to take to report in accordance with the CRFD Regime.

  1. Stay informed with the progress of the CRFD

    This includes staying across whether any changes are made to the
    framework proposed in the second consultation paper. It will also
    be important to keep your board up to date to ensure that directors
    are well advised of what the ،isation will need to do in order
    to meet its reporting obligations. Equally, during the
    implementation of the CRFD Regime it will be important to keep the
    board informed of the ،isation’s climate-related risks and
    opportunities as directors will need to sign off on disclosures
    made in the directors’ report.

  1. Deeply understand your environmental

    If the implementation of the CRFD Regime is successful, it is
    likely that Australia, as a major supporter of the Taskforce for
    Nature Related Financial Disclosures, will in due course move to
    also require disclosures in relation to impacts on biodiversity,
    which will likely also eventually form part of the ISSB’s

    Organisations would do well in the interim to s، internally
    understanding their environmental footprint more broadly in light
    of international developments around such disclosures and the
    evident rapid rise in social expectations regarding sustainable

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice s،uld be sought
about your specific cir،stances.

Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year

Employer of C،ice for Gender Equality

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Environment from Australia

NSW Government Announces Dramatic Planning Re-structure

Vincent Young

On Friday 18 August 2023, New South Wales Premier, Chris Minns, unveiled a drastic new portfolio re-structure aimed at tackling energy challenges, climate change, environmental preservation and ،using concerns.

ESG Policy Update

K&L Gates

As previously reported by K&L Gates, the Australian Compe،ion and Consumer Commission (the ACCC) released its long-awaited guidance on the making of environmental and sustainability claims.